|
|
|
TPO
Coated Tubes
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tubes |
Total
Activity |
Calibrators |
Controls |
Samples |
|
Reagent |
|
|
|
|
| Calibrators |
---- |
20
µl |
---- |
---- |
|
Controls |
---- |
---- |
20
µl |
---- |
|
Samples |
---- |
---- |
---- |
20
µl |
|
Tracer |
200
µl |
200
µl |
200
µl |
200
µl |
|
-
Incubate: 90 min R.T. shaking (150 rpm) -
Aspirate and wash: 1 x 2 ml -
Count |
||||
8.
CALCULATION OF RESULTS
B0
B0 Cpm
Binding
capacity = ------
(%)
= ------------ x 100
T
T Cpm
Percent
binding for Calibrators, Controls and Samples =
B
Calibrator or Sample Cpm
Binding
(%) = ------
(%) =
------------------------------------
x 100
B0
B0 Cpm
Draw
the calibration curve on log/logit graph by plotting the B/B0 (%)
obtained for each calibrator (y-axis) against the relative concentration
(x-axis). Calculate the B/B0 (%) of each sample and read the TPO Ab
concentration in U/ml, by interpolating on the calibration curve.
EXAMPLE
OF CALCULATION
The
values reported below must be considered as an example and may not be used in
place of experimental data.
|
Description |
Average
cpm. |
B/B0
(%) |
TPO
Ab conc. (U/ml) |
| Total
Activity (T) |
45543 |
- |
- |
| CAL
0 |
25243 |
100 |
0 |
| CAL
1 |
21920 |
86.8 |
20 |
| CAL
2 |
17531 |
69.5 |
60 |
| CAL
3 |
8323 |
33.0 |
300 |
| CAL
4 |
3570 |
14.1 |
1000 |
| CAL
5 |
1795 |
7.1 |
3000 |
| CONTROL
1 |
14307 |
56.7 |
106.8 |
| CONTROL
2 |
6514 |
25.8 |
432.5 |
| P1 |
20142 |
79.8 |
33.9 |
| P2 |
11678 |
46.3 |
165.3 |
| P3 |
3345 |
13.2 |
1118 |
9. REFERENCE VALUES
It
is recommended that each laboratory determines its own reference interval.
Values reported below are only indicative.
|
Lower
than 30 U/ml: |
Negative
for anti-TPO auto-antibodies. |
|
Between
30–50 U/ml |
Borderline |
|
Higher
than 50 U/ml: |
Positive
for anti-TPO auto-antibodies. |
10.
PERFORMANCE OF THE ASSAY
SPECIFICITY
No
cross-reactions have been observed with anti-thyroglobulin autoantibodies
present in human serum.
SENSITIVITY
Analytical
sensitivity
The
sensitivity was calculated based upon the calibration curve and expressed as the
minimal dose showing a significant difference from the Zero Calibrator (mean
value - 2 S.D.). This dose is 1.3 U/ml.
Functional sensitivity
The
functional assay sensitivity is the lowest value which is measured with a
precision of max. 20% inter-assay variance. For the anti-TPO autoantibodies,
this value is lower than 20 U/ml.
PRECISION
Precision
was evaluated upon intra- and inter-assay variability, at different analyte
concentrations.
Intra-assay
|
Serum |
Mean |
± |
S.D. |
C.V. |
N |
|
|
(U/ml) |
(%) |
|
||
|
1 |
27.2 |
± |
2.1 |
7.7 |
20 |
|
2 |
141.7 |
± |
10.2 |
7.2 |
20 |
|
3 |
902 |
± |
117.4 |
13.0 |
20 |
Inter-assay
|
Serum |
Mean |
± |
S.D. |
C.V. |
N |
|
|
(U/ml) |
(%) |
|
||
|
1 |
29.3 |
± |
4.8 |
16.4 |
9 |
|
2 |
149 |
± |
12.3 |
8.3 |
9 |
|
3 |
951 |
± |
92 |
9.7 |
9 |
ACCURACY
Accuracy
of the method has been checked by the recovery and parallelism tests:
Recovery
Test
|
|
Expected |
Measured |
Recovery |
|
|
(U/ml) |
(U/ml) |
(%) |
||
|
S1 |
|
- |
34.8 |
- |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
0 |
17.4 |
21.7 |
124.7 |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
1 |
27.4 |
31.7 |
115.7 |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
2 |
47.4 |
50.4 |
106.3 |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
3 |
167.4 |
152.5 |
91.1 |
|
S2 |
|
- |
133.5 |
- |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
0 |
66.8 |
57.3 |
85.9 |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
1 |
76.8 |
79.3 |
103.3 |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
2 |
96.8 |
100.5 |
103.8 |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
3 |
216.8 |
221.6 |
102.2 |
Parallelism
Test
Serums
with high analyte concentration were tested at different dilutions with the Zero
Calibrator.
| Dilution |
Expected (U/ml) |
Measured (U/ml) |
Recovery (%) |
|
S1
undiluted |
- |
796 |
- |
|
1/2 |
398 |
454 |
114.1 |
|
1/4 |
199 |
217 |
109.1 |
|
1/8 |
99.5 |
107.7 |
108.2 |
|
1/16 |
49.8 |
48.4 |
97.2 |
|
S2
undiluted |
- |
1216 |
- |
|
1/2 |
608 |
672 |
110.5 |
|
1/4 |
304 |
347 |
114.1 |
|
1/8 |
152 |
159.7 |
105.1 |
|
1/16 |
76 |
83.1 |
109.3 |
NB.
Due to the heterogeneity of autoantibodies, for some patient samples a nonlinear
dilution is possible
11.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
Prentice
L.M. et al. Geogographical
distribution of subclinical autoimmune thyroid disease in Britain : A study
using highly sensitive direct assays for autoantibodies to thyroglobulin and
thyroid peroxidase. Acta
Endocrinologica , 1990, 123, 493-8.
2.
Jaume J.C.
et al. Thyroid
peroxidase autoantibody epitopic « fingerprints » in juvenile
Hashimoto’s thyroiditis : evidence for conservation over time an in
families. Clin. Exp.
Immunol., 1996, 104, 115-123.
3.
Czarnocka
B. et al. Immunochemical
properties of hTPO. Thyroperoxidase and Thyroid Autoimmunity, Ed. P. Carayon, J.
Ruf. 1990, 207, 59-67.
4.
Czarnocka
B. et al. Majority
of thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease
are directed to a single TPO domain. Autoimmunity, 1996, 23, 145-154.
5.
Takamatsu
J. et al. Correlation of antithyroglobulin and antithyroid-peroxidase antibody
profiles with clinical and ultrasiound characteristics of chronic thyroiditis. Thyroid,
1998, 8, 1101-6.
6.
Smyth P. et
al. Serum
thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies, thyroid volume, and outcome in breast
carcinoma. J.
Endocrinol. Metab., 1998, 83, 2711-6.
7.
Gauna A. et
al. Immunological
aspects of Graves’ disease patients in different clinical stages. J.
Endocrinol. Invest., 1989, 12, 671-7.
8.
Stagnaro-Green
A. et al. Detection of at-risk pregnancy by means of highly sensitive assays for
thyroid autoantibodies. JAMA,
1990, 264,1422-5.
|