|
|
|
TBG
CT
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tubes |
Total
Activity |
NSB |
Calibrators |
Controls |
Samples |
|
Reagent |
|
|
|
|
|
| Calibrator 0 |
- |
25
µl |
- |
- |
- |
| Calibrators |
- |
- |
25
µl |
- |
- |
|
Controls |
- |
- |
- |
25
µl |
- |
|
Samples |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25
µl |
|
Tracer |
100
µl |
100
µl |
100
µl |
100
µl |
100
µl |
|
Antiserum |
- |
- |
100
µl |
100
µl |
100
µl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Mix gently and incubate: 1 h R.T. |
|||||
|
Precipitating
solution |
- |
2
ml |
2
ml |
2
ml |
2
ml |
|
-
Mix gently and incubate for 10 min at R.T. -
Centrifuge at 1,500 g for 15 min. -
Aspirate the supernatant or decant thoroughly. -
Count the radioactivity of tubes for one minute in a gamma counter. |
|||||
8.CALCULATION OF the
RESULTS
First
calculate for each duplicate the average NSB-corrected counts per minute.
Calculate
the binding of each duplicate as a percent of maximum binding (B0),
with the NSB-corrected cpm.
Using
Logit-Log graph paper, plot Percent Bound on the Y-axis against Concentration on
the X-axis for each of the calibrators. Draw a straight line approximating the
path of the calibration points. Concentrations for the unknowns are then
estimated from the line by interpolation.
In
case of computer-assisted analysis, a special program suitable for
radioimmunoassays and adapted to the counter-computer is to be used.
EXAMPLE
OF CALCULATION
The
values reported below must be considered as an example and may not be used in
place of experimental data.
|
Description |
Average
cpm. |
B/B0
(%) |
TBG |
| Total
Activity (T) |
79017 |
- |
- |
| NSB |
3430 |
- |
- |
| CAL
0 |
66124 |
100 |
0 |
| CAL
1 |
56988 |
85.4 |
4 |
| CAL
2 |
39944 |
58.2 |
10 |
| CAL
3 |
30654 |
43.4 |
17 |
| CAL
4 |
18818 |
24.5 |
35 |
| CAL
5 |
13562 |
16.2 |
60 |
| CONTROL |
30089 |
42.5 |
17 |
| P1 |
36128 |
52.5 |
12.2 |
| P2 |
24612 |
33.8 |
23.6 |
| P3 |
16372 |
20.6 |
44.3 |
9.
REFERENCE VALUES
It is recommended that each laboratory determines its own reference interval. Values reported below are only indicative.
|
|
Mean±
S.D. |
N |
|
Men
Healthy |
16.9
± 3.9 |
100 |
|
Women
Healthy |
21.2
± 4.9 |
99 |
|
Pregnant
Women |
35.1
± 6.9 |
29 |
|
Women
under estrogens |
22.4
± 6.9 |
20 |
|
Normal
range |
16.9
± 6.2 |
|
10.PERFORMANCE
OF THE ASSAY
SENSITIVITY
Analytical
sensitivity
The sensitivity was calculated based upon
the calibration curve and expressed as the minimal dose showing a significant
difference from the Zero Calibrator (mean value - 2 S.D.). This dose is 1.1 IU
/ml.
PRECISION
Precision was evaluated upon intra- and inter-assay variability at different analyte concentrations.
Intra-assay
|
Serum |
Mean |
± |
S.D. |
C.V. |
N |
|
|
(IU/ml) |
(%) |
|
||
|
1 |
12.1 |
± |
0.6 |
5.0 |
20 |
|
2 |
21.9 |
± |
0.8 |
3.7 |
20 |
|
3 |
41.3 |
± |
1.7 |
4.1 |
20 |
Inter-assay
|
Serum |
Mean |
± |
S.D. |
C.V. |
N |
|
|
(IU/ml) |
(%) |
|
||
|
1 |
12.6 |
± |
0.4 |
3.2 |
9 |
|
2 |
23.2 |
± |
0.6 |
2.6 |
9 |
|
3 |
40.6 |
± |
1.8 |
4.4 |
9 |
ACCURACY
Accuracy
of the method has been checked by the recovery and parallelism test
Recovery
test: Samples,
mixed with equal volumes of each calibration point, were tested.
|
|
MEASURED |
EXPECTED |
RECOVERY |
|
S1 S1
+ CAL 0 S1
+ CAL 1 S1
+ CAL 2 S1
+ CAL 3 S1
+ CAL 4 S1
+ CAL 5 |
14.2 7.4 10.1 12.0 14.5 24.7 45.9 |
- 7.1 9.5 12.1 15.6 24.6 39.6 |
- 103.6 106.1 99.4 92.8 100.4 115.9 |
|
S2 S2
+ CAL 0 S2
+ CAL 1 S2
+ CAL 2 S2
+ CAL 3 S2
+ CAL 4 S2
+ CAL 5 |
18.0 9.5 11.8 13.6 17.2 26.1 46.7 |
- 9.0 11.3 14.0 17.5 26.5 41.5 |
- 106.0 103.9 97.2 98.6 98.4 112.6 |
Parallelism
test:
Samples with high analyte concentrations were tested at differents dilution with
the zero calibrator.
|
DILUTION |
MEASURED |
EXPECTED |
RECOVERY
(%) |
|
S1
undiluted 1/2 1/4 1/8 |
30.6 17.1 8.8 3.5 |
- 15.3 7.6 3.8 |
- 111.9 115.3 90.7 |
|
S2
undiluted 1/2 1/4 1/8 |
37.4 23.1 12.4 5.3 |
- 18.7 9.3 4.7 |
- 123.7 133.1 114.2 |
11.
BIBLIOGRAPHIE – BIBLIOGRAPHY – ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ – BIBLIOGRAFIE – BIBLIOGRAFIA
- BIBLIOGRAFÍA
1.
Attwood
E. C. The T3/TBG Ratio and the Biochemical Investigation of Thyrotoxicosis.
Clin. Biochem., 1979, 12 (3),
88-92.
2.
Gershengorn
M. C., Larsen P. R., Robbins J. Radioimmunoassay
for Serum Thyroxine-Binding Globulin: Results in Normal Subjects and in
Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1976, 42
(5), 907-911.
3.
Hesch
R. D., Gatz J., McIntosh C. H. S., Janzen J., Hehrmann R. Radioimmunoassay of
thyroxine-binding globulin in human plasma. Clin. Chim. Acta, 1976, 70, 33-42.
4.
Mulaisho
C., Utiger R. D. Serum thyroxine-binding globulin: determination by competitive
ligand-binding assay in thyroid disease and pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol., 1977, 85,
314-324.
|