|
|
|
TgAb
(ATAB)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tubes |
Total
Activity |
Calibrators |
Controls |
Samples |
|
Reagent |
|
|
|
|
| Calibrators |
---- |
20
µl |
---- |
---- |
|
Control
Serums |
---- |
---- |
20
µl |
---- |
|
Samples |
---- |
---- |
---- |
20
µl |
|
Tracer |
200
µl |
200
µl |
200
µl |
200
µl |
|
-
Mix and incubate: 90 min R.T. shaking (150 rpm) -
Aspirate and wash: 1 x 2 ml -
Count |
||||
8.
CALCULATION OF RESULTS
Bo
Bo Cpm
Binding
capacity = ------
% =
------------
x 100
T
T Cpm
Percent
binding for Calibrators, Controls and Samples =
B
Calibrator or Sample Cpm
Binding
% = ------ % =
----------------------------------- x
100
Bo
Bo Cpm
Draw
the calibration curve on log/lin graph by plotting the B/Bo% obtained for each
calibrator (y-axis) against the relative concentration (x-axis). Calculate the
B/Bo% of each sample and read the anti-Tg concentration in IU/ml, by
interpolating on the calibration curve.
EXAMPLE
OF CALCULATION
The
values reported below must be considered as an example and may not be used in
place of experimental data.
|
Description |
Average
cpm |
B/B0
(%) |
TG
Ab conc. (IU/ml) |
| Total
Activity (T) |
57953 |
- |
- |
| Cal
0 |
28090 |
100 |
0 |
| Cal
1 |
24340 |
86.6 |
20 |
| Cal
2 |
16927 |
60.3 |
60 |
| Cal
3 |
9706 |
34.5 |
200 |
| Cal
4 |
4100 |
14.6 |
1000 |
| Cal
5 |
2048 |
7.3 |
2000 |
| CONTROL
1 |
10843 |
38.6 |
158.2 |
| CONTROL
2 |
5757 |
20.5 |
604.7 |
| P1 |
13998 |
49.8 |
91.5 |
| P2 |
6634 |
23.6 |
464.8 |
| P3 |
4270 |
15.2 |
942.9 |
9.
REFERENCE
VALUES
It
is recommended that each laboratory determines its own reference interval.
Values reported below are only indicative.
| Lower
than 30 IU/ml |
Negative
for anti-Thyroglobulin auto-antibodies. |
| Between
30 - 70 IU/ml |
Borderline |
| Higher
than 70 IU/ml |
Positive
for anti-Thyroglobulin auto-antibodies. |
10.
PERFORMANCES OF THE ASSAY
SPECIFICITY
No
cross-reactions have been observed with anti-TPO autoantibodies present in human
serum.
SENSITIVITY
Analytical
sensitivity
The
sensitivity was calculated based upon the calibration curve and expressed as the
minimal dose showing a significant difference from the Zero Calibration (mean
value - 2 S.D.). This dose is 6 IU/ml.
Functional
sensitivity
The
functional assay sensitivity is the
lowest value which is measured with a precision of maximum 20% inter-assay
variance. For the anti-thyroglobulin autoantibodies, this value is lower than 15
IU/ml
PRECISION
Precision
was evaluated upon intra- and inter-assay variability, at different analyte
concentrations.
Intra-assay
|
Serum |
Mean |
± |
S.D. |
C.V. |
N |
|
|
(IU/ml) |
% |
|
||
|
A |
72.6 |
± |
6.0 |
8.3 |
20 |
|
B |
345.7 |
± |
24.7 |
7.1 |
20 |
|
C |
889.9 |
± |
51.0 |
5.7 |
20 |
Inter-assay
|
Serum |
Mean |
± |
S.D. |
C.V. |
N |
|
|
(IU/ml) |
% |
|
||
|
A |
90.3 |
± |
8.4 |
9.3 |
9 |
|
B |
390.0 |
± |
49.8 |
12.8 |
9 |
|
C |
985.4 |
± |
104.9 |
10.6 |
9 |
ACCURACY
Accuracy
of the method has been checked by the recovery and parallelism tests:
Recovery
Test
Samples,
mixed with equal volumes of each calibrator, were tested.
|
|
Expected (IU/ml) |
Measured (IU/ml) |
Recovery (%) |
|
|
S1 |
|
- |
50.4 |
- |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
0 |
25.2 |
32.0 |
127.0 |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
1 |
35.2 |
39.1 |
111.1 |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
2 |
55.2 |
59.6 |
108.0 |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
3 |
125.2 |
111.8 |
89.3 |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
4 |
525.2 |
392.4 |
74.7 |
|
S1
+ |
CAL
5 |
1025.2 |
1251.1 |
122.0 |
|
S2 |
|
- |
102.9 |
- |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
0 |
51.5 |
63.9 |
124.1 |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
1 |
61.5 |
64.2 |
104.4 |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
2 |
81.5 |
84.7 |
103.9 |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
3 |
151.5 |
133.0 |
87.8 |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
4 |
551.5 |
367.2 |
66.6 |
|
S2
+ |
CAL
5 |
1051.5 |
1261.3 |
120.0 |
Parallelism
Test
A
serum with high analyte concentration was tested at different dilutions with the
Zero Calibrator.
|
Dilution |
Expected (IU/ml) |
Measured (IU/ml) |
Recovery (%) |
|
S1
undiluted |
- |
1109 |
- |
|
1/2 |
554.5 |
586.7 |
105.8 |
|
1/4 |
277.3 |
275.0 |
99.2 |
|
1/8 |
138.6 |
143.0 |
103.2 |
|
1/16 |
69.3 |
82.0 |
118.3 |
NB.
Due to the heterogeneity of autoantibodies, for some patient samples a nonlinear
dilution is possible
11.BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
Prentice
L.M. et al. Geogographical
distribution of subclinical autoimmune thyroid disease in Britain : A study
using highly sensitive direct assays for autoantibodies to thyroglobulin and
thyroid peroxidase. Acta
Endocrinologica , 1990, 123, 493-8.
2.
Jaume J.C.
et al. Thyroid
peroxidase autoantibody epitopic « fingerprints » in juvenile
Hashimoto’s thyroiditis : evidence for conservation over time an in
families. Clin. Exp.
Immunol., 1996, 104, 115-123.
3.
Czarnocka
B. et al. Immunochemical
properties of hTPO. Thyroperoxidase and Thyroid Autoimmunity, Ed. P. Carayon, J.
Ruf. 1990, 207, 59-67.
4.
Czarnocka
B. et al. Majority
of thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease
are directed to a single TPO domain. Autoimmunity, 1996, 23, 145-154.
5.
Takamatsu
J. et al. Correlation of antithyroglobulin and antithyroid-peroxidase antibody
profiles with clinical and ultrasiound characteristics of chronic thyroiditis. Thyroid,
1998, 8, 1101-6.
6.
Smyth P. et
al. Serum
thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies, thyroid volume, and outcome in breast
carcinoma. J.
Endocrinol. Metab., 1998, 83, 2711-6.
7.
Gauna A. et
al. Immunological
aspects of Graves’ disease patients in different clinical stages. J.
Endocrinol. Invest., 1989, 12, 671-7.
8.
Stagnaro-Green
A. et al. Detection of at-risk pregnancy by means of highly sensitive assays for
thyroid autoantibodies. JAMA, 1990, 264,1422-5.
|